In this essay by Deborah Brandt she tells about
that from the industrial revolution till now that literacy has loomed as one if
not they greatest engines of profit and competitive advantage in the 20th
century. What Brandt calls sponsors of literacy have influenced these individuals?
These sponsors of literacy are agents local or distant, concrete or abstract,
who enable, support, teach, model, as well as recruit, regulate, suppress, or
withhold literacy and gain some advantage by having it in some form or another
The key quote that I felt was important in this essay was one in which she compared
literacy to a sort of commodity, or good. Brandt states, "literacy, like
land, is a valued commodity in this economy, a key resource in gaining profit
and edge. This value helps to explain, of course, the lengths to which people
will go to secure literacy for themselves or children" (page 558, Sponsors
of Literacy, By Deborah Brandt). It is true about literacy that it does hold
high regard in society. By being able to speak and write well gives you the
advantage over others that aren't quite as able to express themselves in a
certain way. That is why people place such high standards for acquiring
literacy for themselves and others around them.
The key term critical to the work is that of sponsors (page 556, Sponsors of
Literacy, By Deborah Brandt). Brandt explains that these individuals are people
who are a tangible group of people that literacy has required learning
throughout history have always had to ask for permission, sanction, assistance,
coercion, or at minimum, contact with existing trade routes. In simpler terms
it means that individuals have always had to gauge their discourse to somebody
else to make sure that they are following the rules and guidelines that for mentioned
group is participating in.
Overall, the essay contends that sponsors are the type of people whom we look for guidance
and assistance when it comes to looking for the proper literacy necessary for
some sort of skill set. These either can be real people or simply by just
picking up a newspaper, book, or magazine. Sponsors can have the impact of
being able to affect one's feelings towards that person. It can affect how,
what, why, and how people read and write.
Finally, Brandt states that the affluent people in society have better access to
powerful literacy sponsors as part of their economic and political privileges,
whereas poor people or low-caste racial groups have less consistent, less
politically secured access to literacy sponsors. Individuals have the ability
as elder literacy sponsors to pass on their knowledge to other individuals.
Literacy can accumulate in layers from families, workplaces, schools, memory,
and ones in which literacy was shaped out of ideological and economic struggles
of the past history.
Think you are overlooking that Brandt does not just say that sponsors enable people to acquire literacy. She says that they also "suppress" and "regulate" this acquisition. How? Why?
ReplyDelete